Professional Liability Defense

Overview

Hutchison & Steffen has defended numerous claims of malpractice brought against attorneys, doctors, dentists, and other licensed professionals. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.

The exposure in these matters runs past the verdict. A malpractice claim can reach a license, a hospital privilege, a partnership agreement, an insurance renewal, and a reputation built over a career, and several of those consequences arrive before any court rules on the merits.

Hutchison & Steffen is a full-service, AV-rated law firm serving Nevada and the Southwest. The Firm has practiced in the State since 1996 and has grown to nearly 60 attorneys.

To discuss a claim, a demand letter, or a board inquiry with a professional liability attorney at the Firm, call 702.385.2500 in Las Vegas or 775.853.8746 in Reno, or contact Hutchison & Steffen online.

Understanding The Practice

What Is Professional Liability Defense?

Professional liability defense is the representation of a licensed professional accused of failing to meet the standard of their field. Hutchison & Steffen defends the professional. A professional liability attorney at the Firm answers the claim, works with the carrier, and handles the licensing consequences that often run alongside the lawsuit on a separate track with separate deadlines.

The claims differ by profession but share a structure. The plaintiff has to establish the standard of care that applied, show a departure from it, and connect that departure to an actual loss. Causation is where most of these cases are genuinely contested, because a disappointing outcome is not by itself a departure from the standard, and a departure that changed nothing produces no damages.

For health care providers, NRS 41A.015 fixes the standard: professional negligence is the failure, in rendering services, to use the reasonable care, skill, or knowledge ordinarily used under similar circumstances by similarly trained and experienced providers of health care. The comparison is to peers in similar circumstances, not to a perfect result.

Matters of this kind are handled by attorneys including Mark A. Hutchison, whose practice includes professional liability defense, for professionals in Las Vegas, Henderson, Summerlin, North Las Vegas, Reno, Sparks, Carson City, and statewide.

What makes Nevada distinctive is that the limitation period is not one rule. It is at least three, and which one applies depends on the profession rather than on the kind of mistake. NRS 11.207 governs actions against attorneys and veterinarians, and only those two: four years after the plaintiff sustains damage or two years after discovery, whichever occurs earlier. NRS 11.2075 governs accountants and accounting firms on a different structure, the earliest of two years after discovery, four years after the service was completed, or four years after the report on the financial statements was first issued. Health care providers run under NRS 41A.097 instead. Both of the first two are tolled while the professional conceals the act, error, or omission.

Nevada also builds gates into the front of some of these cases, which is the defense's first opportunity. Under NRS 41A.071 an action for professional negligence against a provider of health care must be filed with a supporting affidavit from a medical expert, who practices or has practiced in a substantially similar area, identifying each allegedly negligent provider and setting out the specific acts alleged against each. If it is missing, the court shall dismiss the action without prejudice. For design professionals in nonresidential construction matters, NRS 11.258 requires the claimant's attorney to file an affidavit with a report attached concurrently with service of the first pleading, and NRS 11.259 makes dismissal mandatory when that does not happen.

These matters run alongside other practices. Provider licensing and board advocacy is handled with our Healthcare Professionals Advocacy attorneys, coverage and carrier questions with our Insurance Litigation attorneys, agency proceedings with our Administrative & Regulatory Law attorneys, and construction matters with our Construction Law attorneys.

How We Defend Nevada Professionals

Professional Liability Defense Services

Medical & Dental Malpractice Defense

The Firm defends physicians, dentists, nurses, and the practices and facilities that employ them against claims of professional negligence under NRS Chapter 41A. The defense begins with the affidavit filed under NRS 41A.071, because an affidavit that fails to identify a particular provider or to state the specific acts alleged against that provider is a dismissal argument available at the outset rather than at trial.

Legal Malpractice Defense

Claims against attorneys carry a case within a case: the client has to prove not only a departure from the standard but that the underlying matter would have come out differently. The Firm defends lawyers and firms on that structure, and on the limitation period in NRS 11.207, which runs four years from damage sustained or two years from discovery, whichever occurs earlier, and often resolves the matter before causation is reached.

Accounting & Financial Professional Defense

Accountants sit under their own limitation statute. NRS 11.2075 runs from the earliest of two years after discovery, four years after the service was completed, or four years after the report on the financial statements was first issued, which means the engagement file and the issuance date frequently decide timeliness. The Firm defends accountants, accounting firms, and other financial professionals against negligence and breach of engagement claims.

Design Professional Defense

Architects and engineers in nonresidential construction matters get a statutory gate under NRS 11.258. The claimant's attorney must file an affidavit, with a report from the consulted professional attached, concurrently with service of the first pleading, and may file late only up to 45 days after the action is filed with an explanation. NRS 11.259 makes dismissal mandatory when the affidavit, the report, or the name of the consulted professional is missing.

Licensing Board & Disciplinary Proceedings

A board matter is not the lawsuit and does not follow it. It carries its own timeline, its own record, and a sanction that reaches the ability to practice rather than only the checkbook. The Firm represents professionals in disciplinary proceedings before Nevada licensing boards and coordinates that defense with the civil case, so that an answer filed in one does not become evidence in the other. Our guide to the Nevada administrative appeal process covers what follows a board decision, including the petition for judicial review under NRS Chapter 233B.

Early Case Assessment & Carrier Coordination

Most professional liability policies carry notice conditions and consent-to-settle provisions, and a late or incomplete notice is a coverage problem layered on top of a liability problem. The Firm evaluates the claim early, reports it in the form the policy requires, and gives the professional and the carrier a realistic read on exposure before defense costs have shaped the decision. Our article on reducing risk before a dispute begins covers the preventive side.

One Claim, Different Rules

Nevada Malpractice Deadlines and Filing Gates by Profession

Nevada does not apply a single malpractice limitation period. Which statute controls depends on the profession, and two professions face a filing requirement the claimant must satisfy before the case can proceed at all. The table reflects the statutes as posted at publication.
Nevada Malpractice Deadlines and Filing Gates by Profession
Profession Limitation Period Pre-Suit Filing Gate
Health Care Provider For injuries on or after October 1, 2023, three years from the date of injury or two years from discovery, whichever occurs first, under NRS 41A.097(3), tolled by concealment Affidavit required at filing under NRS 41A.071, from a medical expert in a substantially similar area, naming each provider and the specific acts alleged. The court shall dismiss without prejudice if it is missing
Attorney Four years after the plaintiff sustains damage or two years after discovery, whichever occurs earlier, under NRS 11.207, tolled while the attorney conceals None imposed by statute
Veterinarian The same NRS 11.207 period that applies to attorneys, four years from damage or two years from discovery, whichever occurs earlier None imposed by statute
Accountant or Accounting Firm The earliest of two years after discovery, four years after the service was completed, or four years after the report on the financial statements was first issued, under NRS 11.2075, tolled by concealment None imposed by statute
Design Professional in Nonresidential Construction No profession-specific malpractice statute applies. The general periods in NRS Chapter 11 govern, including the separate repose periods for actions based on improvements to real property Attorney affidavit with a report attached, filed concurrently with service of the first pleading under NRS 11.258, extendable to 45 days after filing with an explanation. Dismissal is mandatory under NRS 11.259
Damages run on a separate rule. Only claims against providers of health care carry a statutory ceiling on noneconomic damages. NRS 41A.035 began at $350,000 and rises by $80,000 on January 1 of each year from 2024 through 2028 to reach $750,000, increasing 2.1 percent annually after that, which puts the 2026 figure at $590,000. No comparable statutory cap applies to claims against attorneys, accountants, or design professionals.

Getting Ahead of the Claim

When to Involve Defense Counsel

Before the response goes out. The instinct of a careful professional who receives a complaint letter is to explain, and the explanation is almost always written before anyone has read the file the way a plaintiff's lawyer will read it. That letter becomes an exhibit. So does an amended chart note, a reconstructed memorandum, or a conversation with the client or patient intended to smooth things over.

Timing also governs the gates. The affidavit requirements in NRS 41A.071 and NRS 11.258 are evaluated on what the claimant filed, and the arguments they create have to be raised early to be worth anything. A defense that waits until discovery to look closely at the affidavit has usually given up the cheapest dismissal available in the case.

The parallel track deserves its own attention. A licensing board inquiry and a civil lawsuit arising from the same facts move on separate schedules under separate rules, and a statement made in one forum can be used in the other. Coordinating both from the beginning is less expensive than repairing the overlap afterward.

This page is educational and is not legal advice. Reading it does not create an attorney-client relationship with Hutchison & Steffen. The statutes cited reflect Nevada law as posted at publication, and the figure in NRS 41A.035 changes each January. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.

Situations That Call for Defense Counsel:

  • You have received a demand letter, a complaint, or a notice of intent to bring a claim
  • A former client or patient has requested their complete file without explanation
  • A licensing board has opened an inquiry, whether or not a lawsuit exists
  • Your carrier has been notified and has not yet assigned defense counsel
  • You are being asked to give a statement, sit for an interview, or produce records
  • A colleague or your practice has been named alongside you
  • You are considering correcting, supplementing, or annotating a file after a complaint
  • A claim was filed against a health care provider and you have not reviewed the supporting affidavit
  • A hospital privilege, partnership status, or employment agreement turns on the outcome

Common Questions

Frequently Asked Questions

How Long Does Someone Have to Sue a Nevada Professional for Malpractice?

It depends on the profession, because Nevada uses several statutes rather than one. An action against an attorney or a veterinarian must be commenced within four years after the plaintiff sustains damage or within two years after discovery, whichever occurs earlier, under NRS 11.207. An action against an accountant runs under NRS 11.2075, on the earliest of two years after discovery, four years after the service was completed, or four years after the report on the financial statements was first issued. A claim against a health care provider for an injury on or after October 1, 2023, runs under under NRS 41A.097(3), three years from injury or two years from discovery, whichever occurs first.

What Is the Affidavit Requirement in a Nevada Medical Malpractice Case?

NRS 41A.071 requires an action for professional negligence against a provider of health care to be filed with a supporting affidavit from a medical expert, as the statute puts it, who practices or has practiced in an area substantially similar to the one at issue. The affidavit must identify or describe each allegedly negligent provider and set out the specific acts of alleged negligence for each defendant separately. If the action is filed without a conforming affidavit, the court shall dismiss it without prejudice, which is why reviewing that affidavit closely is the first step in the defense.

Is There a Cap on Damages in a Nevada Medical Malpractice Case?

On noneconomic damages, yes. NRS 41A.035 set the limit at $350,000 and provides that it increases by $80,000 on January 1 of each year beginning in 2024 and ending in 2028, when it reaches $750,000, after which it rises 2.1 percent annually rounded to the nearest dollar. For 2026 that figure is $590,000. The cap applies to noneconomic damages rather than to economic losses such as medical expenses and lost earnings, and no comparable statutory ceiling applies to claims against attorneys, accountants, or design professionals.

Do a Malpractice Lawsuit and a Licensing Board Complaint Follow the Same Process?

No, and treating them as one matter is a common and costly error. The lawsuit is a civil action decided in court under the rules of civil procedure, where the remedy is money. A board proceeding is an administrative matter governed by the board's own rules, where the remedy reaches the license itself. Either can proceed without the other, and a position taken in one forum can be used in the other, which is the reason to coordinate both from the start.

What Should a Professional Do First After Receiving Notice of a Claim?

Preserve the file exactly as it stands, give notice to the carrier in the form the policy requires, and route all communication about the matter through counsel. Do not supplement, annotate, or reorganize records after notice arrives, and do not contact the claimant to resolve it informally. Most professional liability policies carry notice conditions and consent-to-settle provisions, and a late or incomplete notice can create a coverage dispute on top of the underlying claim.

chevron-down
linkedin facebook pinterest youtube rss twitter instagram facebook-blank rss-blank linkedin-blank pinterest youtube twitter instagram